Author Topic: Committee of Inquiry  (Read 5636 times)

Offline iruka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #15 on: March 29, 2011, 01:06:18 AM »
"You Couldn,t let it lie, could you".  Vic Reeves,

Nope   ;)

Offline xJHB

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2011, 02:58:10 AM »
Was it theChief Minister who just this week warned us that the committee of inquiry would likely be costing far more than £500,000. It was almost as if he was using it is a last minute detterent to  going through with the inquiry.
Well if they can happily spend £1,000,000 unsuccessfully chasing one individual whats another Million.
Its not going to be missed if it comes out of the Criminal Fund.

Offline Chevalier Blanc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1812
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2011, 04:47:52 PM »
I stated that i want an enquiry that will be completely open, go where ever it takes one.
Why did the police etc not take actions when abuse was reported to them.
Why didn't the States members take action.
Who did the covering up?
Who was involved in the abuse?
Reopen the Victoria College abuse again and get the truth.
All the things need an answer so has to get the guilty parties brought to justice the ones that are still alive.
Until that is done Jersey can never hold it's head up high again because of the dark clouds hanging over it.
Justice must be done!

Offline iruka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #18 on: April 03, 2011, 11:35:46 PM »
Some good points Chevalier.

Should the enquiry also look at the spurious and "me too" claims which inflated the work the police had to do?

I am thinking of similar cases (well documented) where the group think tended to automatically assume that all allegations were true.


Offline rico sorda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1450
  • locked & loaded lets rock rsx
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #19 on: April 05, 2011, 01:21:13 AM »
"Should the enquiry also look at the spurious and "me too" claims which inflated the work the police had to do?"


How many were there? Do you know?

rs
one ban away from oblivion rsx

Offline iruka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #20 on: April 13, 2011, 12:56:09 AM »
How many were there?

Haven't counted.

Quote
Do you know?

Yes. I know.

Offline rico sorda

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1450
  • locked & loaded lets rock rsx
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #21 on: April 13, 2011, 12:58:37 AM »
Haven't counted.

Yes. I know.

Nice one

rs
one ban away from oblivion rsx

Offline Chevalier Blanc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1812
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #22 on: July 17, 2011, 06:16:41 AM »
This is an extract from Rico Sorda's blog and i would like to know if the police are going to or are doing something about the threats that this victim is getting.

"The "thank you" from the panel Chairman was a consequence of receiving visual assurances from the media that they agreed with this request. The request was made, not least, because one of the members of public present, who is also an Abuse Survivor, is the target of threatening and intimidatory phone calls, and has even had a stranger come to their door to, among other things, threaten him/her not to reveal the name of their Abuser. This Survivor has subsequently received more threats since this hearing."

Offline Chevalier Blanc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1812
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #23 on: July 19, 2011, 12:17:25 AM »
So where does this put Mick Gradwell into the enquiry?
Not a good up standing copper that took over from Lenny Harper and rubbished everything Harper had done.
ILM will probable have something good to say about his up standing copper!   I cannot answer that because it is confidently.
Talk about the NOTW they want to come over here and dig up the dirt but it would take to long.

Offline iruka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: Committee of Inquiry
« Reply #24 on: March 18, 2014, 11:46:35 PM »
Well that didn't take too long did it...

I wonder how they are going to persuade bona fide witnesses to attend...?

Another £6 million (?) well spent. What's the running total now?