heres a fact . we do not need a american company to lay tarmac in jersey.
it must be a foot in the door for them , is this one of mcleans start ups??
so if this goverment wants all of us manual workers down la motte street on a daily basis , just carry on.
no doubt the yanks are not paying any tax to the island and removing the cash they earn.
here,s a thing yokel local, long before finance , jersey went along ok without any , so called specialists , and jersey became operated by a bunch of outsiders .
this running for outside help for a simple job must stop and those who cant , go and find local labour who can
I do appreciate where you are coming from - and just because I work in the Finance does not mean that I only care about the £££ numbers (albeit that is important - the money
has stopped growing on trees, for most of us and for the States

) - IMO it is a good thing for everyone in Jersey that
all folk in Jersey have at least a fair shake of the stick and at least a share of the pie.
For me whether the deal is a good one or not depends on the exact terms (and costs - both cash paid out and to everyone in Jersey)......not to say it's about keeping everyone in Jersey happy (not possible!) nor having to keep a status quo......I am as sceptical as the next Jerseyman about whether this deal is a good thing, but I don't have a problem with the principle - the devil is in the detail (as always).
But as long as the contract was tendered out fairly then IMO fair enough (if the winning bid does involve shipping people in to do the hands on work then IMO either something very badly wrong with the amount being paid or a very bad reflection on the local companies - or both!).
I would favour making the terms of such contracts public (easy to do, if agreed in advance that is one of the terms!).....so that the door is not closed to new companies (Jersey or not) when contract next up for renewal. For me a good contract would involve a requirement for, say, 90% of the labour used (shovel and management) to be undertaken by locals (5 Years +), with basic minimum terms of employment and that training (apprenticships) would be offered both for youngsters and existing staff (including for management!). I am relaxed about the US company itself not paying tax and taking the profits elsewhere - just have to factor that into the competing bids (and the tax thing should give an edge to a locally owned company if the bids are also assessed for overall value to Jersey).
But I agree with you that Jersey a bit too fond of "Experts" from outside Jersey - sometimes it is important to use folk who have skills and experiance that can only be gained outside Jersey - but too often it seems they are employed simply as a CYA method - by the locals.....and that the folk engaged are either 2nd class, or simply cannot do things that are needed - due to "the Jersey Way". 20 years behind and stuck in the mud.