I can't believe the the lack of self awareness in his latest comment:
'Most significantly, the case is sub judice. There is, therefore, very little which can be said publicly about the case'
Secondly, I don't publish comments which are mere gratuitous insults.
Other forums - including that of the The Rag - have rapidly become nothing more than non-credible troll swamps - habituated in part by very sad losers who post under 20 different avatars - and submitting the same comment with the words rejigged a bit each time. '
So lets get this straight. He doesn't:
1) Publicly comment on cases which are sub-judice
2) Publish comments which are gratuitous insults
3) Have a comments section which is inhabited by a small number of people who submit the same comments with the words re-jigged a bit each time.
Must be another blog I have been reading about for the past 2 years.
